Regression (OLS) - overview
This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons (max. of 3) by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table
Regression (OLS) | Goodness of fit test | One sample $z$ test for the mean | Two sample $t$ test - equal variances not assumed | Sign test | One sample $z$ test for the mean |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent variables | Independent variable | Independent variable | Independent/grouping variable | Independent variable | Independent variable | |
One or more quantitative of interval or ratio level and/or one or more categorical with independent groups, transformed into code variables | None | None | One categorical with 2 independent groups | 2 paired groups | None | |
Dependent variable | Dependent variable | Dependent variable | Dependent variable | Dependent variable | Dependent variable | |
One quantitative of interval or ratio level | One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$) | One quantitative of interval or ratio level | One quantitative of interval or ratio level | One of ordinal level | One quantitative of interval or ratio level | |
Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | |
$F$ test for the complete regression model:
|
| H0: $\mu = \mu_0$
Here $\mu$ is the population mean, and $\mu_0$ is the population mean according to the null hypothesis. | H0: $\mu_1 = \mu_2$
Here $\mu_1$ is the population mean for group 1, and $\mu_2$ is the population mean for group 2. |
| H0: $\mu = \mu_0$
Here $\mu$ is the population mean, and $\mu_0$ is the population mean according to the null hypothesis. | |
Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | |
$F$ test for the complete regression model:
|
| H1 two sided: $\mu \neq \mu_0$ H1 right sided: $\mu > \mu_0$ H1 left sided: $\mu < \mu_0$ | H1 two sided: $\mu_1 \neq \mu_2$ H1 right sided: $\mu_1 > \mu_2$ H1 left sided: $\mu_1 < \mu_2$ |
| H1 two sided: $\mu \neq \mu_0$ H1 right sided: $\mu > \mu_0$ H1 left sided: $\mu < \mu_0$ | |
Assumptions | Assumptions | Assumptions | Assumptions | Assumptions | Assumptions | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test statistic | Test statistic | Test statistic | Test statistic | Test statistic | Test statistic | |
$F$ test for the complete regression model:
Note 2: if there is only one independent variable in the model ($K = 1$), the $F$ test for the complete regression model is equivalent to the two sided $t$ test for $\beta_1.$ | $X^2 = \sum{\frac{(\mbox{observed cell count} - \mbox{expected cell count})^2}{\mbox{expected cell count}}}$
Here the expected cell count for one cell = $N \times \pi_j$, the observed cell count is the observed sample count in that same cell, and the sum is over all $J$ cells. | $z = \dfrac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{\sigma / \sqrt{N}}$
Here $\bar{y}$ is the sample mean, $\mu_0$ is the population mean according to the null hypothesis, $\sigma$ is the population standard deviation, and $N$ is the sample size. The denominator $\sigma / \sqrt{N}$ is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}$. The $z$ value indicates how many of these standard deviations $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0$. | $t = \dfrac{(\bar{y}_1 - \bar{y}_2) - 0}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s^2_1}{n_1} + \dfrac{s^2_2}{n_2}}} = \dfrac{\bar{y}_1 - \bar{y}_2}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s^2_1}{n_1} + \dfrac{s^2_2}{n_2}}}$
Here $\bar{y}_1$ is the sample mean in group 1, $\bar{y}_2$ is the sample mean in group 2, $s^2_1$ is the sample variance in group 1, $s^2_2$ is the sample variance in group 2, $n_1$ is the sample size of group 1, and $n_2$ is the sample size of group 2. The 0 represents the difference in population means according to the null hypothesis. The denominator $\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1} + \frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}$ is the standard error of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}_1 - \bar{y}_2$. The $t$ value indicates how many standard errors $\bar{y}_1 - \bar{y}_2$ is removed from 0. Note: we could just as well compute $\bar{y}_2 - \bar{y}_1$ in the numerator, but then the left sided alternative becomes $\mu_2 < \mu_1$, and the right sided alternative becomes $\mu_2 > \mu_1$. | $W = $ number of difference scores that is larger than 0 | $z = \dfrac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{\sigma / \sqrt{N}}$
Here $\bar{y}$ is the sample mean, $\mu_0$ is the population mean according to the null hypothesis, $\sigma$ is the population standard deviation, and $N$ is the sample size. The denominator $\sigma / \sqrt{N}$ is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}$. The $z$ value indicates how many of these standard deviations $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0$. | |
Sample standard deviation of the residuals $s$ | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
$\begin{aligned} s &= \sqrt{\dfrac{\sum (y_j - \hat{y}_j)^2}{N - K - 1}}\\ &= \sqrt{\dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares error}}{\mbox{degrees of freedom error}}}\\ &= \sqrt{\mbox{mean square error}} \end{aligned} $ | - | - | - | - | - | |
Sampling distribution of $F$ and of $t$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $z$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $t$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $W$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $z$ if H0 were true | |
Sampling distribution of $F$:
| Approximately the chi-squared distribution with $J - 1$ degrees of freedom | Standard normal distribution | Approximately the $t$ distribution with $k$ degrees of freedom, with $k$ equal to $k = \dfrac{\Bigg(\dfrac{s^2_1}{n_1} + \dfrac{s^2_2}{n_2}\Bigg)^2}{\dfrac{1}{n_1 - 1} \Bigg(\dfrac{s^2_1}{n_1}\Bigg)^2 + \dfrac{1}{n_2 - 1} \Bigg(\dfrac{s^2_2}{n_2}\Bigg)^2}$ or $k$ = the smaller of $n_1$ - 1 and $n_2$ - 1 First definition of $k$ is used by computer programs, second definition is often used for hand calculations. | The exact distribution of $W$ under the null hypothesis is the Binomial($n$, $P$) distribution, with $n =$ number of positive differences $+$ number of negative differences, and $P = 0.5$.
If $n$ is large, $W$ is approximately normally distributed under the null hypothesis, with mean $nP = n \times 0.5$ and standard deviation $\sqrt{nP(1-P)} = \sqrt{n \times 0.5(1 - 0.5)}$. Hence, if $n$ is large, the standardized test statistic $$z = \frac{W - n \times 0.5}{\sqrt{n \times 0.5(1 - 0.5)}}$$ follows approximately the standard normal distribution if the null hypothesis were true. | Standard normal distribution | |
Significant? | Significant? | Significant? | Significant? | Significant? | Significant? | |
$F$ test:
|
| Two sided:
| Two sided:
| If $n$ is small, the table for the binomial distribution should be used: Two sided:
If $n$ is large, the table for standard normal probabilities can be used: Two sided:
| Two sided:
| |
$C\%$ confidence interval for $\beta_k$ and for $\mu_y$, $C\%$ prediction interval for $y_{new}$ | n.a. | $C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu$ | Approximate $C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu_1 - \mu_2$ | n.a. | $C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu$ | |
Confidence interval for $\beta_k$:
| - | $\bar{y} \pm z^* \times \dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{N}}$
where the critical value $z^*$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^*$ and $z^*$ (e.g. $z^*$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval). The confidence interval for $\mu$ can also be used as significance test. | $(\bar{y}_1 - \bar{y}_2) \pm t^* \times \sqrt{\dfrac{s^2_1}{n_1} + \dfrac{s^2_2}{n_2}}$
where the critical value $t^*$ is the value under the $t_{k}$ distribution with the area $C / 100$ between $-t^*$ and $t^*$ (e.g. $t^*$ = 2.086 for a 95% confidence interval when df = 20). The confidence interval for $\mu_1 - \mu_2$ can also be used as significance test. | - | $\bar{y} \pm z^* \times \dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{N}}$
where the critical value $z^*$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^*$ and $z^*$ (e.g. $z^*$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval). The confidence interval for $\mu$ can also be used as significance test. | |
Effect size | n.a. | Effect size | n.a. | n.a. | Effect size | |
Complete model:
| - | Cohen's $d$: Standardized difference between the sample mean and $\mu_0$: $$d = \frac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{\sigma}$$ Cohen's $d$ indicates how many standard deviations $\sigma$ the sample mean $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0.$ | - | - | Cohen's $d$: Standardized difference between the sample mean and $\mu_0$: $$d = \frac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{\sigma}$$ Cohen's $d$ indicates how many standard deviations $\sigma$ the sample mean $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0.$ | |
Visual representation | n.a. | Visual representation | Visual representation | n.a. | Visual representation | |
Regression equations with: | - | - | ||||
ANOVA table | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
- | - | - | - | - | ||
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | Equivalent to | n.a. | |
- | - | - | - |
Two sided sign test is equivalent to
| - | |
Example context | Example context | Example context | Example context | Example context | Example context | |
Can mental health be predicted from fysical health, economic class, and gender? | Is the proportion of people with a low, moderate, and high social economic status in the population different from $\pi_{low} = 0.2,$ $\pi_{moderate} = 0.6,$ and $\pi_{high} = 0.2$? | Is the average mental health score of office workers different from $\mu_0 = 50$? Assume that the standard deviation of the mental health scores in the population is $\sigma = 3.$ | Is the average mental health score different between men and women? | Do people tend to score higher on mental health after a mindfulness course? | Is the average mental health score of office workers different from $\mu_0 = 50$? Assume that the standard deviation of the mental health scores in the population is $\sigma = 3.$ | |
SPSS | SPSS | n.a. | SPSS | SPSS | n.a. | |
Analyze > Regression > Linear...
| Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > Chi-square...
| - | Analyze > Compare Means > Independent-Samples T Test...
| Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples...
| - | |
Jamovi | Jamovi | n.a. | Jamovi | Jamovi | n.a. | |
Regression > Linear Regression
| Frequencies > N Outcomes - $\chi^2$ Goodness of fit
| - | T-Tests > Independent Samples T-Test
| Jamovi does not have a specific option for the sign test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the sign test. Go to:
ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman
| - | |
Practice questions | Practice questions | Practice questions | Practice questions | Practice questions | Practice questions | |