Logistic regression  overview
This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons by clicking on the dropdown button in the righthand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table
Logistic regression  Spearman's rho  Friedman test 


Independent variables  Independent variable  Independent variable  
One or more quantitative of interval or ratio level and/or one or more categorical with independent groups, transformed into code variables  One of ordinal level  One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)  
Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  
One categorical with 2 independent groups  One of ordinal level  One of ordinal level  
Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  
Model chisquared test for the complete regression model:
 $\rho_s = 0$
$\rho_s$ is the unknown Spearman correlation in the population. In words: there is no monotonic relationship between the two variables in the population  The scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the scores in any of the other related groups
Note: usually, the related groups are the different measurement points Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher.  
Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  
Model chisquared test for the complete regression model:
 Two sided: $\rho_s \neq 0$ Right sided: $\rho_s > 0$ Left sided: $\rho_s < 0$  The scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the scores in other related groups  
Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  
 Sample of pairs is a simple random sample from the population of pairs. That is, pairs are independent of one another
Note: this assumption is only important for the significance test, not for the correlation coefficient itself. The correlation coefficient itself just measures the strength of the monotonic relationship between two variables.  Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another  
Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  
Model chisquared test for the complete regression model:
The wald statistic can be defined in two ways:
Likelihood ratio chisquared test for individual $\beta_k$:
 $t = \dfrac{r_s \times \sqrt{N  2}}{\sqrt{1  r_s^2}} $ where $r_s$ is the sample Spearman correlation and $N$ is the sample size. The sample Spearman correlation $r_s$ is equal to the Pearson correlation applied to the rank scores.  $Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i  3 \times N(k + 1)$
Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects  so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated.  
Sampling distribution of $X^2$ and of the Wald statistic if H0 were true  Sampling distribution of $t$ if H0 were true  Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H0 were true  
Sampling distribution of $X^2$, as computed in the model chisquared test for the complete model:
 Approximately a $t$ distribution with $N  2$ degrees of freedom  If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chisquared distribution with $k  1$ degrees of freedom.
For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used.  
Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  
For the model chisquared test for the complete regression model and likelihood ratio chisquared test for individual $\beta_k$:
 Two sided:
 If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$:
 
Waldtype approximate $C\%$ confidence interval for $\beta_k$  n.a.  n.a.  
$b_k \pm z^* \times SE_{b_k}$ where $z^*$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $z^*$ and $z^*$ (e.g. $z^*$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval)      
Goodness of fit measure $R^2_L$  n.a.  n.a.  
$R^2_L = \dfrac{D_{null}  D_K}{D_{null}}$ There are several other goodness of fit measures in logistic regression. In logistic regression, there is no single agreed upon measure of goodness of fit.      
Example context  Example context  Example context  
Can body mass index, stress level, and gender predict whether people get diagnosed with diabetes?  Is there a monotonic relationship between physical health and mental health?  Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (preintervention), measurement point 2 (1 week postintervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks postintervention)?  
SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  
Analyze > Regression > Binary Logistic...
 Analyze > Correlate > Bivariate...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples...
 
Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  
Regression > 2 Outcomes  Binomial
 Regression > Correlation Matrix
 ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA  Friedman
 
Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  