Marginal Homogeneity test / Stuart-Maxwell test overview

This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons (max. of 3) by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table

Marginal Homogeneity test / Stuart-Maxwell test	Friedman test	Spearman's rho
Independent variable	Independent/grouping variable	Variable 1
2 paired groups	One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)	One of ordinal level
Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Variable 2
One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)	One of ordinal level	One of ordinal level
Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis
H₀: for each category $j$ of the dependent variable, $\pi_j$ for the first paired group = $\pi_j$ for the second paired group. Here $\pi_j$ is the population proportion in category $j.$	H₀: the population scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other related groups Usually the related groups are the different measurement points. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher.	H₀: $\rho_s = 0$ Here $\rho_s$ is the Spearman correlation in the population. The Spearman correlation is a measure for the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables of at least ordinal measurement level. In words, the null hypothesis would be: H₀: there is no monotonic relationship between the two variables in the population.
Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis
H₁: for some categories of the dependent variable, $\pi_j$ for the first paired group $\neq$ $\pi_j$ for the second paired group.	H₁: the population scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other related groups	H₁ two sided: $\rho_s \neq 0$ H₁ right sided: $\rho_s > 0$ H₁ left sided: $\rho_s < 0$
Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions
Sample of pairs is a simple random sample from the population of pairs. That is, pairs are independent of one another	Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another	Sample of pairs is a simple random sample from the population of pairs. That is, pairs are independent of one another Note: this assumption is only important for the significance test, not for the correlation coefficient itself. The correlation coefficient itself just measures the strength of the monotonic relationship between two variables.
Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic
Computing the test statistic is a bit complicated and involves matrix algebra. Unless you are following a technical course, you probably won't need to calculate it by hand.	$Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i - 3 \times N(k + 1)$ Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects - so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated.	$t = \dfrac{r_s \times \sqrt{N - 2}}{\sqrt{1 - r_s^2}} $ Here $r_s$ is the sample Spearman correlation and $N$ is the sample size. The sample Spearman correlation $r_s$ is equal to the Pearson correlation applied to the rank scores.
Sampling distribution of the test statistic if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $t$ if H₀ were true
Approximately the chi-squared distribution with $J - 1$ degrees of freedom	If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom. For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used.	Approximately the $t$ distribution with $N - 2$ degrees of freedom
Significant?	Significant?	Significant?
If we denote the test statistic as $X^2$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	Two sided: Check if $t$ observed in sample is at least as extreme as critical value $t^$ or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $t$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $t$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $t^$ or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $t$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $t$ observed in sample is equal to or smaller than critical value $t^*$ or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $t$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$
Example context	Example context	Example context
Subjects are asked to taste three different types of mayonnaise, and to indicate which of the three types of mayonnaise they like best. They then have to drink a glass of beer, and taste and rate the three types of mayonnaise again. Does drinking a beer change which type of mayonnaise people like best?	Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (pre-intervention), measurement point 2 (1 week post-intervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks post-intervention)?	Is there a monotonic relationship between physical health and mental health?
SPSS	SPSS	SPSS
Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples... Put the two paired variables in the boxes below Variable 1 and Variable 2 Under Test Type, select the Marginal Homogeneity test	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples... Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the white box below Test Variables Under Test Type, select the Friedman test	Analyze > Correlate > Bivariate... Put your two variables in the box below Variables Under Correlation Coefficients, select Spearman
n.a.	Jamovi	Jamovi
-	ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the box below Measures	Regression > Correlation Matrix Put your two variables in the white box at the right Under Correlation Coefficients, select Spearman Under Hypothesis, select your alternative hypothesis
Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions

Marginal Homogeneity test / Stuart-Maxwell test - overview