Pearson correlation - overview
This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons (max. of 3) by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table
Pearson correlation | Paired sample $t$ test | Friedman test |
You cannot compare more than 3 methods |
---|---|---|---|
Variable 1 | Independent variable | Independent/grouping variable | |
One quantitative of interval or ratio level | 2 paired groups | One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups) | |
Variable 2 | Dependent variable | Dependent variable | |
One quantitative of interval or ratio level | One quantitative of interval or ratio level | One of ordinal level | |
Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | |
H0: $\rho = \rho_0$
Here $\rho$ is the Pearson correlation in the population, and $\rho_0$ is the Pearson correlation in the population according to the null hypothesis (usually 0). The Pearson correlation is a measure for the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables of at least interval measurement level. | H0: $\mu = \mu_0$
Here $\mu$ is the population mean of the difference scores, and $\mu_0$ is the population mean of the difference scores according to the null hypothesis, which is usually 0. A difference score is the difference between the first score of a pair and the second score of a pair. | H0: the population scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other related groups
Usually the related groups are the different measurement points. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher. | |
Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | |
H1 two sided: $\rho \neq \rho_0$ H1 right sided: $\rho > \rho_0$ H1 left sided: $\rho < \rho_0$ | H1 two sided: $\mu \neq \mu_0$ H1 right sided: $\mu > \mu_0$ H1 left sided: $\mu < \mu_0$ | H1: the population scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other related groups | |
Assumptions of test for correlation | Assumptions | Assumptions | |
|
|
| |
Test statistic | Test statistic | Test statistic | |
Test statistic for testing H0: $\rho = 0$:
| $t = \dfrac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{N}}$
Here $\bar{y}$ is the sample mean of the difference scores, $\mu_0$ is the population mean of the difference scores according to the null hypothesis, $s$ is the sample standard deviation of the difference scores, and $N$ is the sample size (number of difference scores). The denominator $s / \sqrt{N}$ is the standard error of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}$. The $t$ value indicates how many standard errors $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0$. | $Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i - 3 \times N(k + 1)$
Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects - so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated. | |
Sampling distribution of $t$ and of $z$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $t$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H0 were true | |
Sampling distribution of $t$:
| $t$ distribution with $N - 1$ degrees of freedom | If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom.
For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used. | |
Significant? | Significant? | Significant? | |
$t$ Test two sided:
| Two sided:
| If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$:
| |
Approximate $C$% confidence interval for $\rho$ | $C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu$ | n.a. | |
First compute the approximate $C$% confidence interval for $\rho_{Fisher}$:
Then transform back to get the approximate $C$% confidence interval for $\rho$:
| $\bar{y} \pm t^* \times \dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}$
where the critical value $t^*$ is the value under the $t_{N-1}$ distribution with the area $C / 100$ between $-t^*$ and $t^*$ (e.g. $t^*$ = 2.086 for a 95% confidence interval when df = 20). The confidence interval for $\mu$ can also be used as significance test. | - | |
Properties of the Pearson correlation coefficient | Effect size | n.a. | |
| Cohen's $d$: Standardized difference between the sample mean of the difference scores and $\mu_0$: $$d = \frac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{s}$$ Cohen's $d$ indicates how many standard deviations $s$ the sample mean of the difference scores $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0.$ | - | |
n.a. | Visual representation | n.a. | |
- | - | ||
Equivalent to | Equivalent to | n.a. | |
OLS regression with one independent variable:
|
| - | |
Example context | Example context | Example context | |
Is there a linear relationship between physical health and mental health? | Is the average difference between the mental health scores before and after an intervention different from $\mu_0 = 0$? | Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (pre-intervention), measurement point 2 (1 week post-intervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks post-intervention)? | |
SPSS | SPSS | SPSS | |
Analyze > Correlate > Bivariate...
| Analyze > Compare Means > Paired-Samples T Test...
| Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples...
| |
Jamovi | Jamovi | Jamovi | |
Regression > Correlation Matrix
| T-Tests > Paired Samples T-Test
| ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman
| |
Practice questions | Practice questions | Practice questions | |