z test for the difference between two proportions overview

This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table

$z$ test for the difference between two proportions	Two way ANOVA	Binomial test for a single proportion $z$ test for a single proportion $z$ test for the difference between two proportions Goodness of fit test Chi-squared test for the relationship between two categorical variables One sample $z$ test for the mean One sample $t$ test for the mean Paired sample $t$ test Two sample $z$ test Two sample $t$ test - equal variances not assumed Two sample $t$ test - equal variances assumed One way ANOVA Two way ANOVA Pearson correlation Regression (OLS)Logistic regression Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test Kruskal-Wallis test Sign test McNemar's test Cochran's Q test Marginal Homogeneity test / Stuart-Maxwell test Friedman test Wilcoxon signed-rank test One sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test Spearman's rho
Independent/grouping variable	Independent/grouping variables
One categorical with 2 independent groups	Two categorical, the first with $I$ independent groups and the second with $J$ independent groups ($I \geqslant 2$, $J \geqslant 2$)
Dependent variable	Dependent variable
One categorical with 2 independent groups	One quantitative of interval or ratio level
Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis
H₀: $\pi_1 = \pi_2$ Here $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 1, and $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 2.	ANOVA $F$ tests: H₀ for main and interaction effects together (model): no main effects and interaction effect H₀ for independent variable A: no main effect for A H₀ for independent variable B: no main effect for B H₀ for the interaction term: no interaction effect between A and B Like in one way ANOVA, we can also perform $t$ tests for specific contrasts and multiple comparisons. This is more advanced stuff.
Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis
H₁ two sided: $\pi_1 \neq \pi_2$ H₁ right sided: $\pi_1 > \pi_2$ H₁ left sided: $\pi_1 < \pi_2$	ANOVA $F$ tests: H₁ for main and interaction effects together (model): there is a main effect for A, and/or for B, and/or an interaction effect H₁ for independent variable A: there is a main effect for A H₁ for independent variable B: there is a main effect for B H₁ for the interaction term: there is an interaction effect between A and B
Assumptions	Assumptions
Sample size is large enough for $z$ to be approximately normally distributed. Rule of thumb: Significance test: number of successes and number of failures are each 5 or more in both sample groups Regular (large sample) 90%, 95%, or 99% confidence interval: number of successes and number of failures are each 10 or more in both sample groups Plus four 90%, 95%, or 99% confidence interval: sample sizes of both groups are 5 or more Group 1 sample is a simple random sample (SRS) from population 1, group 2 sample is an independent SRS from population 2. That is, within and between groups, observations are independent of one another	Within each of the $I \times J$ populations, the scores on the dependent variable are normally distributed The standard deviation of the scores on the dependent variable is the same in each of the $I \times J$ populations For each of the $I \times J$ groups, the sample is an independent and simple random sample from the population defined by that group. That is, within and between groups, observations are independent of one another Equal sample sizes for each group make the interpretation of the ANOVA output easier (unequal sample sizes result in overlap in the sum of squares; this is advanced stuff)
Test statistic	Test statistic
$z = \dfrac{p_1 - p_2}{\sqrt{p(1 - p)\Bigg(\dfrac{1}{n_1} + \dfrac{1}{n_2}\Bigg)}}$ Here $p_1$ is the sample proportion of successes in group 1: $\dfrac{X_1}{n_1}$, $p_2$ is the sample proportion of successes in group 2: $\dfrac{X_2}{n_2}$, $p$ is the total proportion of successes in the sample: $\dfrac{X_1 + X_2}{n_1 + n_2}$, $n_1$ is the sample size of group 1, and $n_2$ is the sample size of group 2. Note: we could just as well compute $p_2 - p_1$ in the numerator, but then the left sided alternative becomes $\pi_2 < \pi_1$, and the right sided alternative becomes $\pi_2 > \pi_1.$	For main and interaction effects together (model): $F = \dfrac{\mbox{mean square model}}{\mbox{mean square error}}$ For independent variable A: $F = \dfrac{\mbox{mean square A}}{\mbox{mean square error}}$ For independent variable B: $F = \dfrac{\mbox{mean square B}}{\mbox{mean square error}}$ For the interaction term: $F = \dfrac{\mbox{mean square interaction}}{\mbox{mean square error}}$ Note: mean square error is also known as mean square residual or mean square within.
n.a.	Pooled standard deviation
-	$ \begin{aligned} s_p &= \sqrt{\dfrac{\sum\nolimits_{subjects} (\mbox{subject's score} - \mbox{its group mean})^2}{N - (I \times J)}}\\ &= \sqrt{\dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares error}}{\mbox{degrees of freedom error}}}\\ &= \sqrt{\mbox{mean square error}} \end{aligned} $
Sampling distribution of $z$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $F$ if H₀ were true
Approximately the standard normal distribution	For main and interaction effects together (model): $F$ distribution with $(I - 1) + (J - 1) + (I - 1) \times (J - 1)$ (df model, numerator) and $N - (I \times J)$ (df error, denominator) degrees of freedom For independent variable A: $F$ distribution with $I - 1$ (df A, numerator) and $N - (I \times J)$ (df error, denominator) degrees of freedom For independent variable B: $F$ distribution with $J - 1$ (df B, numerator) and $N - (I \times J)$ (df error, denominator) degrees of freedom For the interaction term: $F$ distribution with $(I - 1) \times (J - 1)$ (df interaction, numerator) and $N - (I \times J)$ (df error, denominator) degrees of freedom Here $N$ is the total sample size.
Significant?	Significant?
Two sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is at least as extreme as critical value $z^$ or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $z^$ or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or smaller than critical value $z^*$ or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	Check if $F$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $F^*$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $F$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$
Approximate $C\%$ confidence interval for $\pi_1 - \pi_2$	n.a.
Regular (large sample): $(p_1 - p_2) \pm z^* \times \sqrt{\dfrac{p_1(1 - p_1)}{n_1} + \dfrac{p_2(1 - p_2)}{n_2}}$ where the critical value $z^$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^$ and $z^$ (e.g. $z^$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval) With plus four method: $(p_{1.plus} - p_{2.plus}) \pm z^* \times \sqrt{\dfrac{p_{1.plus}(1 - p_{1.plus})}{n_1 + 2} + \dfrac{p_{2.plus}(1 - p_{2.plus})}{n_2 + 2}}$ where $p_{1.plus} = \dfrac{X_1 + 1}{n_1 + 2}$, $p_{2.plus} = \dfrac{X_2 + 1}{n_2 + 2}$, and the critical value $z^$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^$ and $z^$ (e.g. $z^$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval)	-
n.a.	Effect size
-	Proportion variance explained $R^2$: Proportion variance of the dependent variable $y$ explained by the independent variables and the interaction effect together: $$ \begin{align} R^2 &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares model}}{\mbox{sum of squares total}} \end{align} $$ $R^2$ is the proportion variance explained in the sample. It is a positively biased estimate of the proportion variance explained in the population. Proportion variance explained $\eta^2$: Proportion variance of the dependent variable $y$ explained by an independent variable or interaction effect: $$ \begin{align} \eta^2_A &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares A}}{\mbox{sum of squares total}}\\ \\ \eta^2_B &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares B}}{\mbox{sum of squares total}}\\ \\ \eta^2_{int} &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares int}}{\mbox{sum of squares total}} \end{align} $$ $\eta^2$ is the proportion variance explained in the sample. It is a positively biased estimate of the proportion variance explained in the population. Proportion variance explained $\omega^2$: Corrects for the positive bias in $\eta^2$ and is equal to: $$ \begin{align} \omega^2_A &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares A} - \mbox{degrees of freedom A} \times \mbox{mean square error}}{\mbox{sum of squares total} + \mbox{mean square error}}\\ \\ \omega^2_B &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares B} - \mbox{degrees of freedom B} \times \mbox{mean square error}}{\mbox{sum of squares total} + \mbox{mean square error}}\\ \\ \omega^2_{int} &= \dfrac{\mbox{sum of squares int} - \mbox{degrees of freedom int} \times \mbox{mean square error}}{\mbox{sum of squares total} + \mbox{mean square error}}\\ \end{align} $$ $\omega^2$ is a better estimate of the explained variance in the population than $\eta^2$. Only for balanced designs (equal sample sizes). Proportion variance explained $\eta^2_{partial}$: $$ \begin{align} \eta^2_{partial\,A} &= \frac{\mbox{sum of squares A}}{\mbox{sum of squares A} + \mbox{sum of squares error}}\\ \\ \eta^2_{partial\,B} &= \frac{\mbox{sum of squares B}}{\mbox{sum of squares B} + \mbox{sum of squares error}}\\ \\ \eta^2_{partial\,int} &= \frac{\mbox{sum of squares int}}{\mbox{sum of squares int} + \mbox{sum of squares error}} \end{align} $$
n.a.	ANOVA table
-
Equivalent to	Equivalent to
When testing two sided: chi-squared test for the relationship between two categorical variables, where both categorical variables have 2 levels.	OLS regression with two categorical independent variables and the interaction term, transformed into $(I - 1)$ + $(J - 1)$ + $(I - 1) \times (J - 1)$ code variables.
Example context	Example context
Is the proportion of smokers different between men and women? Use the normal approximation for the sampling distribution of the test statistic.	Is the average mental health score different between people from a low, moderate, and high economic class? And is the average mental health score different between men and women? And is there an interaction effect between economic class and gender?
SPSS	SPSS
SPSS does not have a specific option for the $z$ test for the difference between two proportions. However, you can do the chi-squared test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this chi-squared test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the $z$ test. Go to: Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Crosstabs... Put your independent (grouping) variable in the box below Row(s), and your dependent variable in the box below Column(s) Click the Statistics... button, and click on the square in front of Chi-square Continue and click OK	Analyze > General Linear Model > Univariate... Put your dependent (quantitative) variable in the box below Dependent Variable and your two independent (grouping) variables in the box below Fixed Factor(s)
Jamovi	Jamovi
Jamovi does not have a specific option for the $z$ test for the difference between two proportions. However, you can do the chi-squared test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this chi-squared test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the $z$ test. Go to: Frequencies > Independent Samples - $\chi^2$ test of association Put your independent (grouping) variable in the box below Rows, and your dependent variable in the box below Columns	ANOVA > ANOVA Put your dependent (quantitative) variable in the box below Dependent Variable and your two independent (grouping) variables in the box below Fixed Factors
Practice questions	Practice questions

z test for the difference between two proportions - overview