Goodness of fit test overview

This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table

Goodness of fit test	Kruskal-Wallis test	Cochran's Q test	Marginal Homogeneity test / Stuart-Maxwell test	Chi-squared test for the relationship between two categorical variables
Independent variable	Independent/grouping variable	Independent/grouping variable	Independent variable	Independent /column variable
None	One categorical with $I$ independent groups ($I \geqslant 2$)	One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)	2 paired groups	One categorical with $I$ independent groups ($I \geqslant 2$)
Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent /row variable
One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)	One of ordinal level	One categorical with 2 independent groups	One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)	One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)
Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis
H₀: the population proportions in each of the $J$ conditions are $\pi_1$, $\pi_2$, $\ldots$, $\pi_J$ or equivalently H₀: the probability of drawing an observation from condition 1 is $\pi_1$, the probability of drawing an observation from condition 2 is $\pi_2$, $\ldots$, the probability of drawing an observation from condition $J$ is $\pi_J$	If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale and the shape of the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in all $I$ populations: H₀: the population medians for the $I$ groups are equal Else: Formulation 1: H₀: the population scores in any of the $I$ groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other groups Formulation 2: H₀: P(an observation from population $g$ exceeds an observation from population $h$) = P(an observation from population $h$ exceeds an observation from population $g$), for each pair of groups. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher.	H₀: $\pi_1 = \pi_2 = \ldots = \pi_I$ Here $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 1, $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 2, and $\pi_I$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group $I.$	H₀: for each category $j$ of the dependent variable, $\pi_j$ for the first paired group = $\pi_j$ for the second paired group. Here $\pi_j$ is the population proportion in category $j.$	H₀: there is no association between the row and column variable More precisely, if there are $I$ independent random samples of size $n_i$ from each of $I$ populations, defined by the independent variable: H₀: the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in each of the $I$ populations If there is one random sample of size $N$ from the total population: H₀: the row and column variables are independent
Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis
H₁: the population proportions are not all as specified under the null hypothesis or equivalently H₁: the probabilities of drawing an observation from each of the conditions are not all as specified under the null hypothesis	If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale and the shape of the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in all $I$ populations: H₁: not all of the population medians for the $I$ groups are equal Else: Formulation 1: H₁: the poplation scores in some groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other groups Formulation 2: H₁: for at least one pair of groups: P(an observation from population $g$ exceeds an observation from population $h$) $\neq$ P(an observation from population $h$ exceeds an observation from population $g$)	H₁: not all population proportions are equal	H₁: for some categories of the dependent variable, $\pi_j$ for the first paired group $\neq$ $\pi_j$ for the second paired group.	H₁: there is an association between the row and column variable More precisely, if there are $I$ independent random samples of size $n_i$ from each of $I$ populations, defined by the independent variable: H₁: the distribution of the dependent variable is not the same in all of the $I$ populations If there is one random sample of size $N$ from the total population: H₁: the row and column variables are dependent
Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions
Sample size is large enough for $X^2$ to be approximately chi-squared distributed. Rule of thumb: all $J$ expected cell counts are 5 or more Sample is a simple random sample from the population. That is, observations are independent of one another	Group 1 sample is a simple random sample (SRS) from population 1, group 2 sample is an independent SRS from population 2, $\ldots$, group $I$ sample is an independent SRS from population $I$. That is, within and between groups, observations are independent of one another	Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another	Sample of pairs is a simple random sample from the population of pairs. That is, pairs are independent of one another	Sample size is large enough for $X^2$ to be approximately chi-squared distributed under the null hypothesis. Rule of thumb: 2 $\times$ 2 table: all four expected cell counts are 5 or more Larger than 2 $\times$ 2 tables: average of the expected cell counts is 5 or more, smallest expected cell count is 1 or more There are $I$ independent simple random samples from each of $I$ populations defined by the independent variable, or there is one simple random sample from the total population
Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic
$X^2 = \sum{\frac{(\mbox{observed cell count} - \mbox{expected cell count})^2}{\mbox{expected cell count}}}$ Here the expected cell count for one cell = $N \times \pi_j$, the observed cell count is the observed sample count in that same cell, and the sum is over all $J$ cells.	$H = \dfrac{12}{N (N + 1)} \sum \dfrac{R^2_i}{n_i} - 3(N + 1)$ Here $N$ is the total sample size, $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$, and $n_i$ is the sample size of group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N (N + 1)} \times \sum \frac{R^2_i}{n_i}$ and then subtract $3(N + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $H$ is more complicated.	If a failure is scored as 0 and a success is scored as 1: $Q = k(k - 1) \dfrac{\sum_{groups} \Big (\mbox{group total} - \frac{\mbox{grand total}}{k} \Big)^2}{\sum_{blocks} \mbox{block total} \times (k - \mbox{block total})}$ Here $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), a group total is the sum of the scores in a group, a block total is the sum of the scores in a block (usually a subject), and the grand total is the sum of all the scores. Before computing $Q$, first exclude blocks with equal scores in all $k$ groups.	Computing the test statistic is a bit complicated and involves matrix algebra. Unless you are following a technical course, you probably won't need to calculate it by hand.	$X^2 = \sum{\frac{(\mbox{observed cell count} - \mbox{expected cell count})^2}{\mbox{expected cell count}}}$ Here for each cell, the expected cell count = $\dfrac{\mbox{row total} \times \mbox{column total}}{\mbox{total sample size}}$, the observed cell count is the observed sample count in that same cell, and the sum is over all $I \times J$ cells.
Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $H$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of the test statistic if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H₀ were true
Approximately the chi-squared distribution with $J - 1$ degrees of freedom	For large samples, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $I - 1$ degrees of freedom. For small samples, the exact distribution of $H$ should be used.	If the number of blocks (usually the number of subjects) is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom	Approximately the chi-squared distribution with $J - 1$ degrees of freedom	Approximately the chi-squared distribution with $(I - 1) \times (J - 1)$ degrees of freedom
Significant?	Significant?	Significant?	Significant?	Significant?
Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	For large samples, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = H$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If the number of blocks is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If we denote the test statistic as $X^2$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$
n.a.	n.a.	Equivalent to	n.a.	n.a.
-	-	Friedman test, with a categorical dependent variable consisting of two independent groups.	-	-
Example context	Example context	Example context	Example context	Example context
Is the proportion of people with a low, moderate, and high social economic status in the population different from $\pi_{low} = 0.2,$ $\pi_{moderate} = 0.6,$ and $\pi_{high} = 0.2$?	Do people from different religions tend to score differently on social economic status?	Subjects perform three different tasks, which they can either perform correctly or incorrectly. Is there a difference in task performance between the three different tasks?	Subjects are asked to taste three different types of mayonnaise, and to indicate which of the three types of mayonnaise they like best. They then have to drink a glass of beer, and taste and rate the three types of mayonnaise again. Does drinking a beer change which type of mayonnaise people like best?	Is there an association between economic class and gender? Is the distribution of economic class different between men and women?
SPSS	SPSS	SPSS	SPSS	SPSS
Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > Chi-square... Put your categorical variable in the box below Test Variable List Fill in the population proportions / probabilities according to $H_0$ in the box below Expected Values. If $H_0$ states that they are all equal, just pick 'All categories equal' (default)	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Independent Samples... Put your dependent variable in the box below Test Variable List and your independent (grouping) variable in the box below Grouping Variable Click on the Define Range... button. If you can't click on it, first click on the grouping variable so its background turns yellow Fill in the smallest value you have used to indicate your groups in the box next to Minimum, and the largest value you have used to indicate your groups in the box next to Maximum Continue and click OK	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples... Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the white box below Test Variables Under Test Type, select Cochran's Q test	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples... Put the two paired variables in the boxes below Variable 1 and Variable 2 Under Test Type, select the Marginal Homogeneity test	Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Crosstabs... Put one of your two categorical variables in the box below Row(s), and the other categorical variable in the box below Column(s) Click the Statistics... button, and click on the square in front of Chi-square Continue and click OK
Jamovi	Jamovi	Jamovi	n.a.	Jamovi
Frequencies > N Outcomes - $\chi^2$ Goodness of fit Put your categorical variable in the box below Variable Click on Expected Proportions and fill in the population proportions / probabilities according to $H_0$ in the boxes below Ratio. If $H_0$ states that they are all equal, you can leave the ratios equal to the default values (1)	ANOVA > One Way ANOVA - Kruskal-Wallis Put your dependent variable in the box below Dependent Variables and your independent (grouping) variable in the box below Grouping Variable	Jamovi does not have a specific option for the Cochran's Q test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the $p$ value that would have resulted from the Cochran's Q test. Go to: ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the box below Measures	-	Frequencies > Independent Samples - $\chi^2$ test of association Put one of your two categorical variables in the box below Rows, and the other categorical variable in the box below Columns
Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions

Goodness of fit test - overview