Goodness of fit test  overview
This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons by clicking on the dropdown button in the righthand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table
Goodness of fit test  KruskalWallis test  Cochran's Q test  Paired sample $t$ test  One sample $t$ test for the mean  Sign test  Logistic regression  MannWhitneyWilcoxon test 


Independent variable  Independent/grouping variable  Independent/grouping variable  Independent variable  Independent variable  Independent variable  Independent variables  Independent/grouping variable  
None  One categorical with $I$ independent groups ($I \geqslant 2$)  One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)  2 paired groups  None  2 paired groups  One or more quantitative of interval or ratio level and/or one or more categorical with independent groups, transformed into code variables  One categorical with 2 independent groups  
Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  
One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)  One of ordinal level  One categorical with 2 independent groups  One quantitative of interval or ratio level  One quantitative of interval or ratio level  One of ordinal level  One categorical with 2 independent groups  One of ordinal level  
Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  
 If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale and the shape of the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in all $I$ populations:
Formulation 1:
 H_{0}: $\pi_1 = \pi_2 = \ldots = \pi_I$
Here $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 1, $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 2, and $\pi_I$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group $I.$  H_{0}: $\mu = \mu_0$
Here $\mu$ is the population mean of the difference scores, and $\mu_0$ is the population mean of the difference scores according to the null hypothesis, which is usually 0. A difference score is the difference between the first score of a pair and the second score of a pair.  H_{0}: $\mu = \mu_0$
Here $\mu$ is the population mean, and $\mu_0$ is the population mean according to the null hypothesis. 
 Model chisquared test for the complete regression model:
 If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale and the shape of the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in both populations:
Formulation 1:
 
Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  
 If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale and the shape of the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in all $I$ populations:
Formulation 1:
 H_{1}: not all population proportions are equal  H_{1} two sided: $\mu \neq \mu_0$ H_{1} right sided: $\mu > \mu_0$ H_{1} left sided: $\mu < \mu_0$  H_{1} two sided: $\mu \neq \mu_0$ H_{1} right sided: $\mu > \mu_0$ H_{1} left sided: $\mu < \mu_0$ 
 Model chisquared test for the complete regression model:
 If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale and the shape of the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in both populations:
Formulation 1:
 
Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  







 
Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  
$X^2 = \sum{\frac{(\mbox{observed cell count}  \mbox{expected cell count})^2}{\mbox{expected cell count}}}$
Here the expected cell count for one cell = $N \times \pi_j$, the observed cell count is the observed sample count in that same cell, and the sum is over all $J$ cells.  $H = \dfrac{12}{N (N + 1)} \sum \dfrac{R^2_i}{n_i}  3(N + 1)$  If a failure is scored as 0 and a success is scored as 1:
$Q = k(k  1) \dfrac{\sum_{groups} \Big (\mbox{group total}  \frac{\mbox{grand total}}{k} \Big)^2}{\sum_{blocks} \mbox{block total} \times (k  \mbox{block total})}$ Here $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), a group total is the sum of the scores in a group, a block total is the sum of the scores in a block (usually a subject), and the grand total is the sum of all the scores. Before computing $Q$, first exclude blocks with equal scores in all $k$ groups.  $t = \dfrac{\bar{y}  \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{N}}$
Here $\bar{y}$ is the sample mean of the difference scores, $\mu_0$ is the population mean of the difference scores according to the null hypothesis, $s$ is the sample standard deviation of the difference scores, and $N$ is the sample size (number of difference scores). The denominator $s / \sqrt{N}$ is the standard error of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}$. The $t$ value indicates how many standard errors $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0$.  $t = \dfrac{\bar{y}  \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{N}}$
Here $\bar{y}$ is the sample mean, $\mu_0$ is the population mean according to the null hypothesis, $s$ is the sample standard deviation, and $N$ is the sample size. The denominator $s / \sqrt{N}$ is the standard error of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}$. The $t$ value indicates how many standard errors $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0$.  $W = $ number of difference scores that is larger than 0  Model chisquared test for the complete regression model:
The wald statistic can be defined in two ways:
Likelihood ratio chisquared test for individual $\beta_k$:
 Two different types of test statistics can be used; both will result in the same test outcome. The first is the Wilcoxon rank sum statistic $W$:
Note: we could just as well base W and U on group 2. This would only 'flip' the right and left sided alternative hypotheses. Also, tables with critical values for $U$ are often based on the smaller of $U$ for group 1 and for group 2.  
Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $H$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $t$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $t$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $W$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $X^2$ and of the Wald statistic if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $W$ and of $U$ if H_{0} were true  
Approximately the chisquared distribution with $J  1$ degrees of freedom  For large samples, approximately the chisquared distribution with $I  1$ degrees of freedom. For small samples, the exact distribution of $H$ should be used.  If the number of blocks (usually the number of subjects) is large, approximately the chisquared distribution with $k  1$ degrees of freedom  $t$ distribution with $N  1$ degrees of freedom  $t$ distribution with $N  1$ degrees of freedom  The exact distribution of $W$ under the null hypothesis is the Binomial($n$, $P$) distribution, with $n =$ number of positive differences $+$ number of negative differences, and $P = 0.5$.
If $n$ is large, $W$ is approximately normally distributed under the null hypothesis, with mean $nP = n \times 0.5$ and standard deviation $\sqrt{nP(1P)} = \sqrt{n \times 0.5(1  0.5)}$. Hence, if $n$ is large, the standardized test statistic $$z = \frac{W  n \times 0.5}{\sqrt{n \times 0.5(1  0.5)}}$$ follows approximately the standard normal distribution if the null hypothesis were true.  Sampling distribution of $X^2$, as computed in the model chisquared test for the complete model:
 Sampling distribution of $W$:
Sampling distribution of $U$: For small samples, the exact distribution of $W$ or $U$ should be used. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for the standard deviations $\sigma_W$ and $\sigma_U$ is more complicated.  
Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  
 For large samples, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = H$:
 If the number of blocks is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$:
 Two sided:
 Two sided:
 If $n$ is small, the table for the binomial distribution should be used: Two sided:
If $n$ is large, the table for standard normal probabilities can be used: Two sided:
 For the model chisquared test for the complete regression model and likelihood ratio chisquared test for individual $\beta_k$:
 For large samples, the table for standard normal probabilities can be used: Two sided:
 
n.a.  n.a.  n.a.  $C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu$  $C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu$  n.a.  Waldtype approximate $C\%$ confidence interval for $\beta_k$  n.a.  
      $\bar{y} \pm t^* \times \dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}$
where the critical value $t^*$ is the value under the $t_{N1}$ distribution with the area $C / 100$ between $t^*$ and $t^*$ (e.g. $t^*$ = 2.086 for a 95% confidence interval when df = 20). The confidence interval for $\mu$ can also be used as significance test.  $\bar{y} \pm t^* \times \dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}$
where the critical value $t^*$ is the value under the $t_{N1}$ distribution with the area $C / 100$ between $t^*$ and $t^*$ (e.g. $t^*$ = 2.086 for a 95% confidence interval when df = 20). The confidence interval for $\mu$ can also be used as significance test.    $b_k \pm z^* \times SE_{b_k}$ where the critical value $z^*$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $z^*$ and $z^*$ (e.g. $z^*$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval).    
n.a.  n.a.  n.a.  Effect size  Effect size  n.a.  Goodness of fit measure $R^2_L$  n.a.  
      Cohen's $d$: Standardized difference between the sample mean of the difference scores and $\mu_0$: $$d = \frac{\bar{y}  \mu_0}{s}$$ Cohen's $d$ indicates how many standard deviations $s$ the sample mean of the difference scores $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0.$  Cohen's $d$: Standardized difference between the sample mean and $\mu_0$: $$d = \frac{\bar{y}  \mu_0}{s}$$ Cohen's $d$ indicates how many standard deviations $s$ the sample mean $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0.$    $R^2_L = \dfrac{D_{null}  D_K}{D_{null}}$ There are several other goodness of fit measures in logistic regression. In logistic regression, there is no single agreed upon measure of goodness of fit.    
n.a.  n.a.  n.a.  Visual representation  Visual representation  n.a.  n.a.  n.a.  
            
n.a.  n.a.  Equivalent to  Equivalent to  n.a.  Equivalent to  n.a.  Equivalent to  
    Friedman test, with a categorical dependent variable consisting of two independent groups. 
  
Two sided sign test is equivalent to
   If there are no ties in the data, the two sided MannWhitneyWilcoxon test is equivalent to the KruskalWallis test with an independent variable with 2 levels ($I$ = 2).  
Example context  Example context  Example context  Example context  Example context  Example context  Example context  Example context  
Is the proportion of people with a low, moderate, and high social economic status in the population different from $\pi_{low} = 0.2,$ $\pi_{moderate} = 0.6,$ and $\pi_{high} = 0.2$?  Do people from different religions tend to score differently on social economic status?  Subjects perform three different tasks, which they can either perform correctly or incorrectly. Is there a difference in task performance between the three different tasks?  Is the average difference between the mental health scores before and after an intervention different from $\mu_0 = 0$?  Is the average mental health score of office workers different from $\mu_0 = 50$?  Do people tend to score higher on mental health after a mindfulness course?  Can body mass index, stress level, and gender predict whether people get diagnosed with diabetes?  Do men tend to score higher on social economic status than women?  
SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  
Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > Chisquare...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Independent Samples...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples...
 Analyze > Compare Means > PairedSamples T Test...
 Analyze > Compare Means > OneSample T Test...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples...
 Analyze > Regression > Binary Logistic...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Independent Samples...
 
Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  
Frequencies > N Outcomes  $\chi^2$ Goodness of fit
 ANOVA > One Way ANOVA  KruskalWallis
 Jamovi does not have a specific option for the Cochran's Q test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the $p$ value that would have resulted from the Cochran's Q test. Go to:
ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA  Friedman
 TTests > Paired Samples TTest
 TTests > One Sample TTest
 Jamovi does not have a specific option for the sign test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the sign test. Go to:
ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA  Friedman
 Regression > 2 Outcomes  Binomial
 TTests > Independent Samples TTest
 
Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  