Goodness of fit test  overview
This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons by clicking on the dropdown button in the righthand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table
Goodness of fit test  McNemar's test  Friedman test 


Independent variable  Independent variable  Independent/grouping variable  
None  2 paired groups  One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)  
Dependent variable  Dependent variable  Dependent variable  
One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)  One categorical with 2 independent groups  One of ordinal level  
Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  Null hypothesis  
 Let's say that the scores on the dependent variable are scored 0 and 1. Then for each pair of scores, the data allow four options:
Other formulations of the null hypothesis are:
 H_{0}: the population scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other related groups
Usually the related groups are the different measurement points. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher.  
Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  Alternative hypothesis  
 The alternative hypothesis H_{1} is that for each pair of scores, P(first score of pair is 0 while second score of pair is 1) $\neq$ P(first score of pair is 1 while second score of pair is 0). That is, the probability that a pair of scores switches from 0 to 1 is not the same as the probability that a pair of scores switches from 1 to 0. Other formulations of the alternative hypothesis are:
 H_{1}: the population scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other related groups  
Assumptions  Assumptions  Assumptions  


 
Test statistic  Test statistic  Test statistic  
$X^2 = \sum{\frac{(\mbox{observed cell count}  \mbox{expected cell count})^2}{\mbox{expected cell count}}}$
Here the expected cell count for one cell = $N \times \pi_j$, the observed cell count is the observed sample count in that same cell, and the sum is over all $J$ cells.  $X^2 = \dfrac{(b  c)^2}{b + c}$
Here $b$ is the number of pairs in the sample for which the first score is 0 while the second score is 1, and $c$ is the number of pairs in the sample for which the first score is 1 while the second score is 0.  $Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i  3 \times N(k + 1)$
Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects  so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated.  
Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H_{0} were true  Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H_{0} were true  
Approximately the chisquared distribution with $J  1$ degrees of freedom  If $b + c$ is large enough (say, > 20), approximately the chisquared distribution with 1 degree of freedom. If $b + c$ is small, the Binomial($n$, $P$) distribution should be used, with $n = b + c$ and $P = 0.5$. In that case the test statistic becomes equal to $b$.  If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chisquared distribution with $k  1$ degrees of freedom.
For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used.  
Significant?  Significant?  Significant?  
 For test statistic $X^2$:
 If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$:
 
n.a.  Equivalent to  n.a.  
 
   
Example context  Example context  Example context  
Is the proportion of people with a low, moderate, and high social economic status in the population different from $\pi_{low} = 0.2,$ $\pi_{moderate} = 0.6,$ and $\pi_{high} = 0.2$?  Does a tv documentary about spiders change whether people are afraid (yes/no) of spiders?  Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (preintervention), measurement point 2 (1 week postintervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks postintervention)?  
SPSS  SPSS  SPSS  
Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > Chisquare...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples...
 Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples...
 
Jamovi  Jamovi  Jamovi  
Frequencies > N Outcomes  $\chi^2$ Goodness of fit
 Frequencies > Paired Samples  McNemar test
 ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA  Friedman
 
Practice questions  Practice questions  Practice questions  