One sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test overview

This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table

One sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test	$z$ test for the difference between two proportions	Paired sample $t$ test	Friedman test	Friedman test
Independent variable	Independent/grouping variable	Independent variable	Independent/grouping variable	Independent/grouping variable
None	One categorical with 2 independent groups	2 paired groups	One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)	One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)
Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent variable
One of ordinal level	One categorical with 2 independent groups	One quantitative of interval or ratio level	One of ordinal level	One of ordinal level
Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis
H₀: $m = m_0$ Here $m$ is the population median, and $m_0$ is the population median according to the null hypothesis.	H₀: $\pi_1 = \pi_2$ Here $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 1, and $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 2.	H₀: $\mu = \mu_0$ Here $\mu$ is the population mean of the difference scores, and $\mu_0$ is the population mean of the difference scores according to the null hypothesis, which is usually 0. A difference score is the difference between the first score of a pair and the second score of a pair.	H₀: the population scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other related groups Usually the related groups are the different measurement points. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher.	H₀: the population scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other related groups Usually the related groups are the different measurement points. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher.
Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis
H₁ two sided: $m \neq m_0$ H₁ right sided: $m > m_0$ H₁ left sided: $m < m_0$	H₁ two sided: $\pi_1 \neq \pi_2$ H₁ right sided: $\pi_1 > \pi_2$ H₁ left sided: $\pi_1 < \pi_2$	H₁ two sided: $\mu \neq \mu_0$ H₁ right sided: $\mu > \mu_0$ H₁ left sided: $\mu < \mu_0$	H₁: the population scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other related groups	H₁: the population scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other related groups
Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions
The population distribution of the scores is symmetric Sample is a simple random sample from the population. That is, observations are independent of one another	Sample size is large enough for $z$ to be approximately normally distributed. Rule of thumb: Significance test: number of successes and number of failures are each 5 or more in both sample groups Regular (large sample) 90%, 95%, or 99% confidence interval: number of successes and number of failures are each 10 or more in both sample groups Plus four 90%, 95%, or 99% confidence interval: sample sizes of both groups are 5 or more Group 1 sample is a simple random sample (SRS) from population 1, group 2 sample is an independent SRS from population 2. That is, within and between groups, observations are independent of one another	Difference scores are normally distributed in the population Sample of difference scores is a simple random sample from the population of difference scores. That is, difference scores are independent of one another	Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another	Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another
Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic
Two different types of test statistics can be used, but both will result in the same test outcome. We will denote the first option the $W_1$ statistic (also known as the $T$ statistic), and the second option the $W_2$ statistic. In order to compute each of the test statistics, follow the steps below: For each subject, compute the sign of the difference score $\mbox{sign}_d = \mbox{sgn}(\mbox{score} - m_0)$. The sign is 1 if the difference is larger than zero, -1 if the diffence is smaller than zero, and 0 if the difference is equal to zero. For each subject, compute the absolute value of the difference score $\|\mbox{score} - m_0\|$. Exclude subjects with a difference score of zero. This leaves us with a remaining number of difference scores equal to $N_r$. Assign ranks $R_d$ to the $N_r$ remaining absolute difference scores. The smallest absolute difference score corresponds to a rank score of 1, and the largest absolute difference score corresponds to a rank score of $N_r$. If there are ties, assign them the average of the ranks they occupy. Then compute the test statistic: $W_1 = \sum\, R_d^{+}$ or $W_1 = \sum\, R_d^{-}$ That is, sum all ranks corresponding to a positive difference or sum all ranks corresponding to a negative difference. Theoratically, both definitions will result in the same test outcome. However: Tables with critical values for $W_1$ are usually based on the smaller of $\sum\, R_d^{+}$ and $\sum\, R_d^{-}$. So if you are using such a table, pick the smaller one. If you are using the normal approximation to find the $p$ value, it makes things most straightforward if you use $W_1 = \sum\, R_d^{+}$ (if you use $W_1 = \sum\, R_d^{-}$, the right and left sided alternative hypotheses 'flip'). $W_2 = \sum\, \mbox{sign}_d \times R_d$ That is, for each remaining difference score, multiply the rank of the absolute difference score by the sign of the difference score, and then sum all of the products.	$z = \dfrac{p_1 - p_2}{\sqrt{p(1 - p)\Bigg(\dfrac{1}{n_1} + \dfrac{1}{n_2}\Bigg)}}$ Here $p_1$ is the sample proportion of successes in group 1: $\dfrac{X_1}{n_1}$, $p_2$ is the sample proportion of successes in group 2: $\dfrac{X_2}{n_2}$, $p$ is the total proportion of successes in the sample: $\dfrac{X_1 + X_2}{n_1 + n_2}$, $n_1$ is the sample size of group 1, and $n_2$ is the sample size of group 2. Note: we could just as well compute $p_2 - p_1$ in the numerator, but then the left sided alternative becomes $\pi_2 < \pi_1$, and the right sided alternative becomes $\pi_2 > \pi_1.$	$t = \dfrac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{N}}$ Here $\bar{y}$ is the sample mean of the difference scores, $\mu_0$ is the population mean of the difference scores according to the null hypothesis, $s$ is the sample standard deviation of the difference scores, and $N$ is the sample size (number of difference scores). The denominator $s / \sqrt{N}$ is the standard error of the sampling distribution of $\bar{y}$. The $t$ value indicates how many standard errors $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0$.	$Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i - 3 \times N(k + 1)$ Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects - so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated.	$Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i - 3 \times N(k + 1)$ Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects - so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated.
Sampling distribution of $W_1$ and of $W_2$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $z$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $t$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H₀ were true
Sampling distribution of $W_1$: If $N_r$ is large, $W_1$ is approximately normally distributed with mean $\mu_{W_1}$ and standard deviation $\sigma_{W_1}$ if the null hypothesis were true. Here $$\mu_{W_1} = \frac{N_r(N_r + 1)}{4}$$ $$\sigma_{W_1} = \sqrt{\frac{N_r(N_r + 1)(2N_r + 1)}{24}}$$ Hence, if $N_r$ is large, the standardized test statistic $$z = \frac{W_1 - \mu_{W_1}}{\sigma_{W_1}}$$ follows approximately the standard normal distribution if the null hypothesis were true. Sampling distribution of $W_2$: If $N_r$ is large, $W_2$ is approximately normally distributed with mean $0$ and standard deviation $\sigma_{W_2}$ if the null hypothesis were true. Here $$\sigma_{W_2} = \sqrt{\frac{N_r(N_r + 1)(2N_r + 1)}{6}}$$ Hence, if $N_r$ is large, the standardized test statistic $$z = \frac{W_2}{\sigma_{W_2}}$$ follows approximately the standard normal distribution if the null hypothesis were true. If $N_r$ is small, the exact distribution of $W_1$ or $W_2$ should be used. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for the standard deviations $\sigma_{W_1}$ and $\sigma_{W_2}$ is more complicated.	Approximately the standard normal distribution	$t$ distribution with $N - 1$ degrees of freedom	If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom. For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used.	If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom. For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used.
Significant?	Significant?	Significant?	Significant?	Significant?
For large samples, the table for standard normal probabilities can be used: Two sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is at least as extreme as critical value $z^$ or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $z^$ or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or smaller than critical value $z^*$ or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	Two sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is at least as extreme as critical value $z^$ or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $z^$ or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or smaller than critical value $z^*$ or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	Two sided: Check if $t$ observed in sample is at least as extreme as critical value $t^$ or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $t$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $t$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $t^$ or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $t$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $t$ observed in sample is equal to or smaller than critical value $t^*$ or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $t$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$
n.a.	Approximate $C\%$ confidence interval for $\pi_1 - \pi_2$	$C\%$ confidence interval for $\mu$	n.a.	n.a.
-	Regular (large sample): $(p_1 - p_2) \pm z^* \times \sqrt{\dfrac{p_1(1 - p_1)}{n_1} + \dfrac{p_2(1 - p_2)}{n_2}}$ where the critical value $z^$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^$ and $z^$ (e.g. $z^$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval) With plus four method: $(p_{1.plus} - p_{2.plus}) \pm z^* \times \sqrt{\dfrac{p_{1.plus}(1 - p_{1.plus})}{n_1 + 2} + \dfrac{p_{2.plus}(1 - p_{2.plus})}{n_2 + 2}}$ where $p_{1.plus} = \dfrac{X_1 + 1}{n_1 + 2}$, $p_{2.plus} = \dfrac{X_2 + 1}{n_2 + 2}$, and the critical value $z^$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^$ and $z^$ (e.g. $z^$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval)	$\bar{y} \pm t^* \times \dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}$ where the critical value $t^$ is the value under the $t_{N-1}$ distribution with the area $C / 100$ between $-t^$ and $t^$ (e.g. $t^$ = 2.086 for a 95% confidence interval when df = 20). The confidence interval for $\mu$ can also be used as significance test.	-	-
n.a.	n.a.	Effect size	n.a.	n.a.
-	-	Cohen's $d$: Standardized difference between the sample mean of the difference scores and $\mu_0$: $$d = \frac{\bar{y} - \mu_0}{s}$$ Cohen's $d$ indicates how many standard deviations $s$ the sample mean of the difference scores $\bar{y}$ is removed from $\mu_0.$	-	-
n.a.	n.a.	Visual representation	n.a.	n.a.
-	-		-	-
n.a.	Equivalent to	Equivalent to	n.a.	n.a.
-	When testing two sided: chi-squared test for the relationship between two categorical variables, where both categorical variables have 2 levels.	One sample $t$ test on the difference scores. Repeated measures ANOVA with one dichotomous within subjects factor.	-	-
Example context	Example context	Example context	Example context	Example context
Is the median mental health score of office workers different from $m_0 = 50$?	Is the proportion of smokers different between men and women? Use the normal approximation for the sampling distribution of the test statistic.	Is the average difference between the mental health scores before and after an intervention different from $\mu_0 = 0$?	Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (pre-intervention), measurement point 2 (1 week post-intervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks post-intervention)?	Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (pre-intervention), measurement point 2 (1 week post-intervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks post-intervention)?
SPSS	SPSS	SPSS	SPSS	SPSS
Specify the measurement level of your variable on the Variable View tab, in the column named Measure. Then go to: Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > One Sample... On the Objective tab, choose Customize Analysis On the Fields tab, specify the variable for which you want to compute the Wilcoxon signed-rank test On the Settings tab, choose Customize tests and check the box for 'Compare median to hypothesized (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)'. Fill in your $m_0$ in the box next to Hypothesized median Click Run Double click on the output table to see the full results	SPSS does not have a specific option for the $z$ test for the difference between two proportions. However, you can do the chi-squared test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this chi-squared test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the $z$ test. Go to: Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Crosstabs... Put your independent (grouping) variable in the box below Row(s), and your dependent variable in the box below Column(s) Click the Statistics... button, and click on the square in front of Chi-square Continue and click OK	Analyze > Compare Means > Paired-Samples T Test... Put the two paired variables in the boxes below Variable 1 and Variable 2	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples... Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the white box below Test Variables Under Test Type, select the Friedman test	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples... Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the white box below Test Variables Under Test Type, select the Friedman test
Jamovi	Jamovi	Jamovi	Jamovi	Jamovi
T-Tests > One Sample T-Test Put your variable in the box below Dependent Variables Under Tests, select Wilcoxon rank Under Hypothesis, fill in the value for $m_0$ in the box next to Test Value, and select your alternative hypothesis	Jamovi does not have a specific option for the $z$ test for the difference between two proportions. However, you can do the chi-squared test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this chi-squared test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the $z$ test. Go to: Frequencies > Independent Samples - $\chi^2$ test of association Put your independent (grouping) variable in the box below Rows, and your dependent variable in the box below Columns	T-Tests > Paired Samples T-Test Put the two paired variables in the box below Paired Variables, one on the left side of the vertical line and one on the right side of the vertical line Under Hypothesis, select your alternative hypothesis	ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the box below Measures	ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the box below Measures
Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions

One sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test - overview